Urgent question for all

liam stephens · Post by **liam stephens** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 3:38 pm

The allegations are clearly false and unsupported by even a shred of evidence, which therefore makes them malicious. This constitutes slander and I believe that in a court of law you would be entitled to sue on the grounds of slander.

kiwinurse · Post by **kiwinurse** » Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:17 pm

Alex, you were not at the match, nor did you ever ask me. you can not possibly know what went on, and before you make any judgements that are not true, how about consulting the people that were there.It was the second day i lost, not the third.I find it insulting that, as usual youve decided that you are the authority on how my match went, bypassing the actual people that played and who were there.This is sheer arrogance on your part.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:35 am

Alex why r u posting such junk all the time.
What's wrong with you man?
r u some kind of nut?
Man u need serious help.

matthewkooshad · Post by **matthewkooshad** » Fri Dec 16, 2005 2:44 am

Red to play and win.

Jake Lopez · Post by **Jake Lopez** » Sat Dec 17, 2005 3:32 am

matthewkooshad wrote:
Red to play and win.

6-1 19-15 1-6 15-11 6-1 11-8 2-6 8-3 6-9 13x6 1x10

I just noticed this isn't the fastest way :O oh well. thanks for the fun matt.

The American Checker Federation

Urgent question for all

Urgent question for all

correction

Re: Urgent question for all

Re: Urgent question for all

Re: Urgent question for all