Palomino wrote:I agree with what you said there Jay. I was just trying to clarify.we don't have to get lost in semantics.
Respectfully..."Pal"
I understand your desire to clarify the current legal terms regarding the Dan Frank Fund and thank you for doing so.
However, you should know that immediately after I made the post to Richard,"Mr. Checkers" e-mailed me and wrote that the contribution was.....
"zero"
Regards
Jay H
