Strawberry Festival 2009
- Alex_Moiseyev
- Posts: 4358
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:03 pm
- What do you like about checkers?: .....
Strawberry Festival 2009
Heading to Humboldt. Hope this year it will be easy trip for me 
I am playing checkers, not chess.
- Michael Holmes
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:26 am
- Location: Fort Knox, KY
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
I just arrived. This is a very nice hotel here at Deerfield Inn.
- Patrick Parker
- Posts: 972
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:32 pm
- What do you like about checkers?: history of it
the players - Location: amite, louisiana
- Contact:
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
i actually forgot about this tournament
oops
guess this makes me two years in a row missing it
its one of the best tournaments i hope some new people show up
guess this makes me two years in a row missing it
its one of the best tournaments i hope some new people show up
- Michael Holmes
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:26 am
- Location: Fort Knox, KY
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
I check the nccheckers.org website nowadays to make sure I dont overlook a tourney event.
Information for the Masters
7 players in a round robin
Moiseyev 14 points
Holmes 13 points
Keen 10 points
Dionisio 8 points
Tucker 7 points-I think
and I dont know the others. Left to play: Moviseyev plays me, Keen, and Tucker tomorrow. I play Moiseyev, Wethington, and I have a bye (Everybody gets a bye and Keen and Moiseyev already had theirs) on the last round.
There is still a lot of room for either us to win 1st place.
Information for the Masters
7 players in a round robin
Moiseyev 14 points
Holmes 13 points
Keen 10 points
Dionisio 8 points
Tucker 7 points-I think
and I dont know the others. Left to play: Moviseyev plays me, Keen, and Tucker tomorrow. I play Moiseyev, Wethington, and I have a bye (Everybody gets a bye and Keen and Moiseyev already had theirs) on the last round.
There is still a lot of room for either us to win 1st place.
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
Thanks Michael!
If anyone is interested in knowing the names of the other players who are there, J.R. has posted the names of all the players at his web-site, there are 7 players in the Masters group and 9 players in the Majors group.
http://www.nccheckers.org/NCCA/2009%20S ... esults.htm
If anyone is interested in knowing the names of the other players who are there, J.R. has posted the names of all the players at his web-site, there are 7 players in the Masters group and 9 players in the Majors group.
http://www.nccheckers.org/NCCA/2009%20S ... esults.htm
CHECKERS: The Mind Sport of Kings and Ordinary Men.
- Michael Holmes
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:26 am
- Location: Fort Knox, KY
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
I was called today by a couple of people on my way home from the tournament to be given the sad news for me. Alex Moiseyev boosted his poinst from 18 to 22 in the last round by winning both games from Albert Tucker. This places him as the winner and I came in second with 21 points. It was a great tournament although there was a small number of people who attended this year. He won $400.00 and I won $250.00.
The two draws we had with each other are:
[Event "2009 TN Strawberry 10-15 21-17 11-16"]
[Date ""]
[Black "Alex Moiseyev"]
[White "Michael Holmes"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
1. 10-15 21-17 2. 11-16 24-19 3. 15x24 28x19 4. 9-14 17x10 5. 6x24 27x11 6. 8x15 22-18 7.
15x22 25x18 8. 7-10 29-25 9. 4-8 31-27 10. 3-7 25-21 11. 1-6 23-19 12. 8-11 21-17 1/2-1/2
[Event "2009 TN Strawberry 10-15 21-17 11-16"]
[Date ""]
[Black "Michael Holmes"]
[White "Alex Moiseyev"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
1. 10-15 21-17 2. 11-16 22-18 3. 15x22 25x18 4. 16-20 17-13 5. 8-11 29-25 6. 9-14 18x9 7.
5x14 24-19 8. 11-16 25-22 9. 7-10 22-18 1/2-1/2
The two draws we had with each other are:
[Event "2009 TN Strawberry 10-15 21-17 11-16"]
[Date ""]
[Black "Alex Moiseyev"]
[White "Michael Holmes"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
1. 10-15 21-17 2. 11-16 24-19 3. 15x24 28x19 4. 9-14 17x10 5. 6x24 27x11 6. 8x15 22-18 7.
15x22 25x18 8. 7-10 29-25 9. 4-8 31-27 10. 3-7 25-21 11. 1-6 23-19 12. 8-11 21-17 1/2-1/2
[Event "2009 TN Strawberry 10-15 21-17 11-16"]
[Date ""]
[Black "Michael Holmes"]
[White "Alex Moiseyev"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
1. 10-15 21-17 2. 11-16 22-18 3. 15x22 25x18 4. 16-20 17-13 5. 8-11 29-25 6. 9-14 18x9 7.
5x14 24-19 8. 11-16 25-22 9. 7-10 22-18 1/2-1/2
- Alex_Moiseyev
- Posts: 4358
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:03 pm
- What do you like about checkers?: .....
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
It is a history now. My wife already spent them.Michael Holmes wrote:He won $400.00
In the past several tournaments Michael gave me very tough competition and actually I want to thank him for this. For many years to come, since 2002, and especially after Elbert Lowder passed away, I didn't have a serious competition in most of state tournaments and this really hurt my motivation.Michael Holmes wrote:Alex Moiseyev boosted his poinst from 18 to 22 in the last round by winning both games from Albert Tucker.
This year in Tumboldt Michael exceptional performance (7 wins, no losses) and also important victory over Larry Keen pushed me to win almost all games against "average players" in order to finish one point ahead of Michael. Albert Tucker is a good player and certainly belong to Master Division, and I had a very hard goal to accomplish.
Here is last game from last 7th round, which I played with Albert.
[Event "Strwaberry Festival, 2009, Rd. 7, G2"]
[Date "May 9, 2009"]
[Black "A. Moiseyev"]
[White "A. Tucker"]
[Result "2-0"]
1. 10-14 24-20 2. 14-18 (A) 22x15 3. 11x18 23x14 4. 9x18 26-23 (B) 5. 6-9 23x14 6. 9x18 21-17 7. 5-9 (C) 28-24 8. 18-22 (D) 25x18 9. 12-16 20x11 10. 8x22 17-13 (E) 11. 9-14 27-23 (F) 12. 14-17 13-9 13. 17-21 9-5 14. 4-8 32-27 15. 8-11 23-18 (G) 16. 11-16 30-26 17. 22-25 29x22 18. 21-25 26-23 19. 25-30 22-17 20. 30-25 18-14 21. 25-22 17-13 22. 22-17 14-9 23. 16-20 24-19 24. 7-11 (H) 9-6 (I) 25. 1x10 5-1 26. 11-15 19-16 27. 10-14 1-5 28. 14-18 23x14 29. 17x10 5-9 30. 15-19 27-23 31. 19x26 31x22 32. 20-24 22-17 33. 24-27 16-12 34. 27-31 9-14 35. 2-6 14x7 36. 3x10 12-8 37. 31-26 8-3 38. 26-22 3-8 (J) 39. 22-25 8-11 40. 25-21 11-7 41. 21x14 7-2 42. 14-9 2-7 43. 10-14 Red Wins
#1. White to move .................. #2. White to move .................. #3. White to move
...
... 
17-14* Even .......................... 23-18? weak ......................... 19-16** draw
A. I wasn't very happy with choice of opening because though it is not very critical but uneven enough to erase my chances to win both games. In other hands I still had to win at least one game to tie with Michael, and at this point I probaly shouldn't complain too much
B. Pleasant surprise ! This move equalize the game and white advantage is disappear. In the first game I played here 21-17 and game continued ... 8-11 (weak), 17-14 (17-13 strong), 4-8, 28-24, 11-15, 26-23, 8-11 (loses, 6-10 instead was correct), 30-26, 2-6, 29-25, 6-9 (6-10 can be well meet by 23-19*, 10x17, 19x10, 7x14, 26-22 etc WW), 26-22 and after several moves red resigned.
C. Kingsrow opening book recommends here 1-6 as best which is probably true but give me a little help to get a winning chances
D. Over aggressive trade which I took immediately without any doubts. However, if meet properly (see next note), could lead to the quick unfortunate draw.
E. See diagram #1 after trade. All complications and red hopes can be erase by fine 17-14*, 9x18, 27-23, 18x27, 32-23 with following 30-26. I was very lucky that Albert missed this opportunity. In other hands I should note that I also didn't see this possibility during the game!
F. An attempt to catch a man at this point looks very suspicious and gives red a very good game after 30-25, 25-22, 31x22, 14-17, 22-18, 17-21 etc Red strong
G. See diagram #2. This move (23-18) doesn't lose yet, but gives red a very good game and winning chances leading to very uncomfortable ending for white - as happened in the game, Instead, 24-19, 7-10, 23-18 (30-26 also Draw) would be much easy draw for white.
H. This move prevents 19-15, 23-19.
I. Loses! See diagram #3. I knew in general that somewhere here white still should have a draw, but only program helped to find a true: 19-16*, 11-15 (or 2-7, 9-6, 2x9, 13x6, 1x10, 23-19 Draw), 16-11* Draw!
J. Childish beauty - old trick but still works! See diagram #4 below. 3-7 here loses pretty by 22-25, 7x14, 25-21 WW
#4. White to move, red wins

Last edited by Alex_Moiseyev on Sun May 10, 2009 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am playing checkers, not chess.
-
john reade
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:50 pm
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
Michael, What was the date of your 2 games against Alex? John.
-
Ingo_Zachos
- Posts: 1286
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:41 am
- Location: Dortmund, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
John, Michae wrote this on Saturday, May 9th:john reade wrote:Michael, What was the date of your 2 games against Alex? John.
the date of the games then would be sunday, May 10th.Michael Holmes wrote:... Left to play: Moviseyev plays me, Keen, and Tucker tomorrow...
Greetinx,
Ingo
You can rent this space for advertising, if you like!
- Alex_Moiseyev
- Posts: 4358
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:03 pm
- What do you like about checkers?: .....
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
I played with Michael and Albert on Saturday, May 9.
The tournament, Master Division, was played in Round Robin format, 7 rounds - 4 on FridaY and 3 on Saturday.
The tournament, Master Division, was played in Round Robin format, 7 rounds - 4 on FridaY and 3 on Saturday.
I am playing checkers, not chess.
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
Was there any of the "new openings" played in this Ty.??
Always read "Cannings Compilation 2nd Edition" every day.
- Alex_Moiseyev
- Posts: 4358
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:03 pm
- What do you like about checkers?: .....
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
I played with Ray Dionosio Gemini (one win, one draw) and Michael Holmes played with Larry Keen Black Widow (Michael won with red).tommyc wrote:Was there any of the "new openings" played in this Ty.??
I am playing checkers, not chess.
- Michael Holmes
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:26 am
- Location: Fort Knox, KY
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
That was a very good win Alex and thanks for posting it. I am working hard to try to get to your level and I appreciate you making good comments regarding my improvements.
Here is the only new opening I played
[Event "2009 TN Strawberry 11-16 23-19 16-23"]
[Date ""]
[Black "Michael Holmes"]
[White "Larry Keen"]
[Result "1-0"]
1. 11-16 23-19 2. 16x23 26x19 3. 8-11 27-23 4. 4-8 {A} 22-18 5. 11-16 24-20 6. 8-11 28-24 {AA} 7. 9-14 {B} 18x9 8. 5x14 25-22 9. 10-15 19x10 10. 6x15 22-18 11. 15x22 30-26 12. 14-17 {C} 21x14 13. 11-15 20x11 14. 7x16 26x17 15. 16-19 23x16 16. 12x28 31-26 17. 3-7 29-25 18. 15-18 17-13 {D} 19. 7-11 14-10 20. 11-15 26-23 21. 18x27 32x23 22. 28-32 25-22 23. 32-27 23-18 24. 15-19 18-15 25. 19-24 15-11 26. 27-23 10-7 27. 24-27 7-3 28. 27-31 3-8 29. 31-26 22-17 30. 2-6 11-7 31. 23-18 8-11 32. 26-22 11-16 33. 22-25 16-19 34. 18-14 1-0
A) 11-15 was the attack that Larry used against me.}
AA) 25-22 is slightly better
B) 9-13 is slightly better and is the only move given in Richard Pask's "The Golden Dozen".
C) 30-25 is a little easier after 22-26 XX 7-10
D) loses. 26-22 still has time to draw but neither Larry or myself saw this.
E) I was very fortunate to win this game. I seldom win a game from Larry.
Here is the only new opening I played
[Event "2009 TN Strawberry 11-16 23-19 16-23"]
[Date ""]
[Black "Michael Holmes"]
[White "Larry Keen"]
[Result "1-0"]
1. 11-16 23-19 2. 16x23 26x19 3. 8-11 27-23 4. 4-8 {A} 22-18 5. 11-16 24-20 6. 8-11 28-24 {AA} 7. 9-14 {B} 18x9 8. 5x14 25-22 9. 10-15 19x10 10. 6x15 22-18 11. 15x22 30-26 12. 14-17 {C} 21x14 13. 11-15 20x11 14. 7x16 26x17 15. 16-19 23x16 16. 12x28 31-26 17. 3-7 29-25 18. 15-18 17-13 {D} 19. 7-11 14-10 20. 11-15 26-23 21. 18x27 32x23 22. 28-32 25-22 23. 32-27 23-18 24. 15-19 18-15 25. 19-24 15-11 26. 27-23 10-7 27. 24-27 7-3 28. 27-31 3-8 29. 31-26 22-17 30. 2-6 11-7 31. 23-18 8-11 32. 26-22 11-16 33. 22-25 16-19 34. 18-14 1-0
A) 11-15 was the attack that Larry used against me.}
AA) 25-22 is slightly better
B) 9-13 is slightly better and is the only move given in Richard Pask's "The Golden Dozen".
C) 30-25 is a little easier after 22-26 XX 7-10
D) loses. 26-22 still has time to draw but neither Larry or myself saw this.
E) I was very fortunate to win this game. I seldom win a game from Larry.
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
IN REPLY TO MICHAEL
11-16 23-19 2. 16x23 26x19 3. 8-11 27-23 4. 4-8 {A} 22-18 5. 11-16 24-20 6. 8-11 28-24 {AA} 7. 9-14 {B} 18x9 8. 5x14 25-22 9. 10-15 19x10 10. 6x15 22-18 11. 15x22 30-26(C1) 12. 14-17 {C} 21x14 13. 11-15 20x11 14. 7x16 26x17 15. 16-19 23x16 16. 12x28 31-26
17. 3-7.2925 ?? (D)
(A) A GOOD PP ATTACK FROM Michael and a transposition from the single corner ………..in Master Play.
(AA) 2824!! (see Cannings Comp)THIS WAS A defensive “COOK” I PLAYED ON MAC BANKS ABT 6-7 YRS AGO BUT GOING INTO A strong MAN DWN POSITION FOR RED , AS Michael says 25-22 generally better but its not without its problems either against the killer attacks red has to hand, MB THIS IS WHY Larry played 2824 to avoid these.
Cannings Cook- See……Var3
In Cannings defensive “cook” on the Black Widow in Var 3 below 11-16 23-19 16-23 26-19* I spent about 12 months exploring the theory which Hellman had years earlier rejected, when he discarded this particular line to the dust bin.
Having said that, present technology certainly played its part, something Hellman wouldn’t of had at his disposal at the time. It was what you might call a “pet” project of mine and there have been a few of them, some that didn’t end in successful conclusions I can honestly say.
(B) 9-14 is ok but,…913 PP N BEST forces white into the “cook”(now book knowledge is everything) and the draw choices are limited for white.
(C1) 3025PP BUT 3026 LOOKS OK
(C) AND 2-6 IS ALSO GOOD for red
(D)….Larrys 2925 seems a bit calous here tho it still drs ok (was he hoping for a win?) while 1713 1st simplifies the position completely to an easy draw, but hindsight is 20/20.
A well played Ty by Michael who it could be said from recent results is 2nd best in the USA only to da “man” Alex, that hasn’t gone un-noticed.
CORRECTION TO THE DATE, IT WAS ACTUALLY 2001 WHEN I PLAYED THIS "DEFENSIVE" COOK ON MAC I THINK IN THE wORLD qUALIFIER WITH THE WINNER TO PLAY G.MILLER AND OF COURSE MAC WON THAT QUALIFIER AND BEAT GEORGE LATER FOR THE MAIL TITLE WHICH HE STILL HOLDS.
11-16 23-19 2. 16x23 26x19 3. 8-11 27-23 4. 4-8 {A} 22-18 5. 11-16 24-20 6. 8-11 28-24 {AA} 7. 9-14 {B} 18x9 8. 5x14 25-22 9. 10-15 19x10 10. 6x15 22-18 11. 15x22 30-26(C1) 12. 14-17 {C} 21x14 13. 11-15 20x11 14. 7x16 26x17 15. 16-19 23x16 16. 12x28 31-26
17. 3-7.2925 ?? (D)
(A) A GOOD PP ATTACK FROM Michael and a transposition from the single corner ………..in Master Play.
(AA) 2824!! (see Cannings Comp)THIS WAS A defensive “COOK” I PLAYED ON MAC BANKS ABT 6-7 YRS AGO BUT GOING INTO A strong MAN DWN POSITION FOR RED , AS Michael says 25-22 generally better but its not without its problems either against the killer attacks red has to hand, MB THIS IS WHY Larry played 2824 to avoid these.
Cannings Cook- See……Var3
In Cannings defensive “cook” on the Black Widow in Var 3 below 11-16 23-19 16-23 26-19* I spent about 12 months exploring the theory which Hellman had years earlier rejected, when he discarded this particular line to the dust bin.
Having said that, present technology certainly played its part, something Hellman wouldn’t of had at his disposal at the time. It was what you might call a “pet” project of mine and there have been a few of them, some that didn’t end in successful conclusions I can honestly say.
(B) 9-14 is ok but,…913 PP N BEST forces white into the “cook”(now book knowledge is everything) and the draw choices are limited for white.
(C1) 3025PP BUT 3026 LOOKS OK
(C) AND 2-6 IS ALSO GOOD for red
(D)….Larrys 2925 seems a bit calous here tho it still drs ok (was he hoping for a win?) while 1713 1st simplifies the position completely to an easy draw, but hindsight is 20/20.
A well played Ty by Michael who it could be said from recent results is 2nd best in the USA only to da “man” Alex, that hasn’t gone un-noticed.
CORRECTION TO THE DATE, IT WAS ACTUALLY 2001 WHEN I PLAYED THIS "DEFENSIVE" COOK ON MAC I THINK IN THE wORLD qUALIFIER WITH THE WINNER TO PLAY G.MILLER AND OF COURSE MAC WON THAT QUALIFIER AND BEAT GEORGE LATER FOR THE MAIL TITLE WHICH HE STILL HOLDS.
Last edited by tommyc on Wed May 13, 2009 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Always read "Cannings Compilation 2nd Edition" every day.
Re: Strawberry Festival 2009
Larry emailed me these results 5/9/09 12:07 PM:
Strawberry Festival Ty. results (May 8th and 9th)
Master Division
Place Name Scores Prize
1. Alex Moiseyev 22 $400
2. Michael Holmes 21 $250
3. Larry Keen 19 $200
4. Albert Tucker 14(tie) $140
4. Ramon Dionisio 14(tie) $140
6. Bill Wethington 8 $110
7. Gene Ellison 7 $ 80
Major Division
Place Name Scores HP Prize
1. Ken Shultz 19 96 $175
2. Harvey Powell 19 94 $175
3. Gary Ellison 18 103 $113
4. Bill Shoffner 18 99 $112
5. Ken Christian 16 $ 90
6. Ted Williamson 13 $ 80
7. Flavious Burgess 12 $ 75
8. Sherwood Tackett 10 82 $ 63
9. Howard Hoover 10 80 $ 62
10. Shelby Mays 5 $ 55
J.R. Would you send a copy of this to the ACF bulletin and to the Missouri newsletter.
Thanks, Larry Keen
http://www.nccheckers.org/NCCA/2009%20S ... esults.htm
Strawberry Festival Ty. results (May 8th and 9th)
Master Division
Place Name Scores Prize
1. Alex Moiseyev 22 $400
2. Michael Holmes 21 $250
3. Larry Keen 19 $200
4. Albert Tucker 14(tie) $140
4. Ramon Dionisio 14(tie) $140
6. Bill Wethington 8 $110
7. Gene Ellison 7 $ 80
Major Division
Place Name Scores HP Prize
1. Ken Shultz 19 96 $175
2. Harvey Powell 19 94 $175
3. Gary Ellison 18 103 $113
4. Bill Shoffner 18 99 $112
5. Ken Christian 16 $ 90
6. Ted Williamson 13 $ 80
7. Flavious Burgess 12 $ 75
8. Sherwood Tackett 10 82 $ 63
9. Howard Hoover 10 80 $ 62
10. Shelby Mays 5 $ 55
J.R. Would you send a copy of this to the ACF bulletin and to the Missouri newsletter.
Thanks, Larry Keen
http://www.nccheckers.org/NCCA/2009%20S ... esults.htm
A Checker Friend, JR Smith