Correction to 21st Century 9-13

[Eric Strange]

Analysis by D. Lafferty
V3, 13.11.2010

1.09-13 23-19 2.10-14 19-15 3.11x18 22x15 4.07-11 26-22 5.11x18 22x15 6.02-07 24-19 7.07-11 30-26 8.11x18 26-22 9.05-09 22x15 10.08-11 15x08 11.04x11 27-24 12.11-15 19x10 13.06x15 24-19 14.15x24 28x19 15.01-05 32-27 16.14-17 21x14 17.09x18 19-16
[ 17...31-26 white win ]
18.12x19 27-23 19.18x27 31x15 ½-½


Correction by Nemesis, Kingsrow and Cake

1.09-13 23-19 2.10-14 19-15 3.11x18 22x15 4.07-11 26-22 5.11x18 22x15 6.02-07 24-19 7.07-11 30-26 8.11x18 26-22 9.03-07 22x15 10.07-11 31-26 11.11x18 26-22 12.13-17
[ 12.06-09 22x15 13.08-11 15x08 14.04x11 27-24 15.11-16 19-15 16.16-19 15-11 17.19-23 Cake variation ]
12...22x15
[ 12...22x13 13.08-11 28-24 14.04-08 24-20 15.05-09 25-22 16.18x25 29x22 17.14-18 22x15 18.11x18 27-24 19.09-14 32-28 20.18-23 19-15 21.23-27 24-19 22.27-31 28-24 23.31-27 15-10 24.06x15 19x10 25.27-32 10-07 26.32-28 24-19 27.08-11 07-03 28.28-24 red win, analysis by Kingsrow ]
13.08-11 15x08 14.04x11 28-24 15.11-15 19x10 16.06x15 27-23 17.01-06 23-19 18.06-10
[ 18.15-18 19-15 19.12-16 24-20 20.16-19 15-11 21.06-09 Kingsrow variation ]
18...32-28 19.05-09 24-20 20.15x24 28x19 21.17-22 25x18 22.14x23

Analysis and comments by Chee Xiong

[liam stephens]

In the Lafferty analysis line there are no pieces on 3 or 29 (at move 17),
so correction does not stand up.

The run up given above is different to the play given in "21st Century 9-13".

[Eric Strange]

I didn't even look at it myself, Chee wanted me to post this. I talked to him and he said playing into the analysis would be stupid considering this work around

[liam stephens]

The Lafferty analysis given in "21st century 9-13" appears sound.
The only stupidity was in claiming a correction where none existed and the editor's endorsement of the claim, without even bothering to check out the play.