3 for 1 in a World Champ. Match"--answer

A forum dedicated to odd facts and trivia about our favorite game.
Post Reply
Mr. Checkers
Posts: 1321
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: Dubuque, Iowa

3 for 1 in a World Champ. Match"--answer

Post by Mr. Checkers »

"Checker Trivia question of the Day". This Champion missed a 3 for 1 in a World Championship Match? (Cont.) Submitted by Alex
Last edited by Mr. Checkers on Sat Feb 04, 2006 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Take care and God Bless. "Mr. Checkers"---Visit with "Inky" at: http://www.broenink-art.nl/maukie2.swf----"No act of kindness no matter how small is ever wasted". --Aesop--
Mr. Checkers
Posts: 1321
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: Dubuque, Iowa

Re: "He Missed a 3 for 1 in a World Championship Ma

Post by Mr. Checkers »

Hint!! Think 1950's. (Cont.)
Take care and God Bless. "Mr. Checkers"---Visit with "Inky" at: http://www.broenink-art.nl/maukie2.swf----"No act of kindness no matter how small is ever wasted". --Aesop--
Gene Lindsay
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Morristown,TN

Re: "He Missed a 3 for 1 in a World Championship Ma

Post by Gene Lindsay »

Tinsley in the first game of his 1955 Match with Oldbury moved into a 3 for 1. Is that what you are referring to?

Gene Lindsay
User avatar
Alex_Moiseyev
Posts: 4353
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:03 pm
What do you like about checkers?: .....

Yes, Tinsley did this once in a while !

Post by Alex_Moiseyev »

Gene Lindsay wrote:Tinsley in the first game of his 1955 Match with Oldbury


Hi, Gene !

Yes, you absolutely right and your answer is 99% correct covering match, game and players :lol: 1% - match was played later, in 1958.

M. Tinsley vs D. Oldbury, WCM 1958, G1
Image
5-9 ??? (18-22 is correct)
I am playing checkers, not chess.
Gene Lindsay
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Morristown,TN

Re: 3 for 1 in a World Champ. Match"--answer

Post by Gene Lindsay »

Alex, I put 1958 first and then changed it to 1955. They say your first thoughts are usually correct. I guess they were this time anyway.

Gene
Post Reply