Well, there is really nothing of value I can add, Jay.Jay H wrote:Thanx Gary......
I am MOST looking forward to reading your thoughts on the subject....educate me brother.
The table , now, belongs to you......![]()
![]()
Regards,
Jay " Don't call me Ray" Hinnershitz
As far as I am concerned, your hypothesis that checkers declined because of (in effect) the national inferiority complex (I'm probably overstating the case, but that is what happened, more-or-less) that occurred after the Soviets launched Sputnik is both original and fascinating...it would probably make a spiffy subject for a Master's Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation.
The "we-only-play-checkers-and-they-play-chess" mentality would, I think, be characteristic of the times. I was not at all aware that newspapers dropped checkers columns during the rise of both Bobby Fischer and Soviet developments in science, but it figures.
And then along comes Fischer, as crazy (even then) as a box of rabid weasels, with his incredible and unique genius plus enough quirky and larger-than-life charisma to make chess both popular and a way to show the Soviets that we can do intellectual stuff, too. And, of course, he was able to do what he said he would. "It ain't bragging if you can do it", said Dizzy Dean... .
And checkers gets lost in the shuffle and falls through the cracks, neither respected nor appreciated for its own considerable merits. That all of this coincided with the rise of the best checkers player ever (from Ohio, of course...) is just a fine piece of irony... .
Anyhow, a really excellent post, Jay; I wish the idea had occurred to me, but it didn't.
Please note that the thoughts expressed in this post are just my opinions; I have done absolutely no research on any of this and I could be wrong, wrong, wrong... .
V/R,
Gary Jenkins/Jaguar72
