ACF rating

Alex_Moiseyev · Post by **Alex_Moiseyev** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:41 pm

Hence, any progress ? I still don't see any updates this year :roll:

Regards,

Alex

rich beckwith · Post by **rich beckwith** » Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:58 pm

I asked our ratings processor for an update a couple weeks back....never got a reply, so not sure if he's on vacation or something.

bazkitcase5 · Post by **bazkitcase5** » Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:29 pm

i'm starting to think he's just about always on vacation...

i still think ratings update from last year's nationals was crap and i'm not the only one who thinks this

Michael Holmes · Post by **Michael Holmes** » Wed Apr 26, 2006 4:44 am

Have ratings information been sent to Igor so that the WCDF can also update their ratings information?

rich beckwith · Post by **rich beckwith** » Wed Apr 26, 2006 4:34 pm

Michael,

Ratings info that has happened to be sent to me has been forwarded to Igor (including IL, TN and others). Other tournament organizers should be doing the same, as stated in some recent "procedure" updates I have put out for reporting tournaments.

Michael Holmes · Post by **Michael Holmes** » Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:22 am

Perhaps Igor or whoever can tell us what tournaments have been used in the WCDF Ratings list so far.
Michael

shinzen · Post by **shinzen** » Thu Apr 27, 2006 6:04 am

Michael Holmes wrote:Perhaps Igor or whoever can tell us what tournaments have been used in the WCDF Ratings list so far.
Michael

Michael,
Yes, exist file with list of full tournaments from 2000 and rating committee work with it.
Greetings,
Igor

matthewkooshad · Post by **matthewkooshad** » Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:31 am

I think it might be a good idea to do the ratings by online database. The tournament directors always posts the results. These results could be submitted/confirmed, then the ratings would be automatically done.

Ingo_Zachos · Post by **Ingo_Zachos** » Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:16 am

Michael Holmes wrote:Perhaps Igor or whoever can tell us what tournaments have been used in the WCDF Ratings list so far.
Michael

Yes Michael, we are working on a list of all WCDF-rated events so far as Igor alreday pointed out, and will publish it soon, so that everybody may sent in unreported results.

Plz be patient, as we first have to work and discuss about it in our commitee before we go publish, but I think this will soon be done.

Greetinx from cloudy Dortmund, Germany

Ingo Zachos

Alex_Moiseyev · Post by **Alex_Moiseyev** » Thu Apr 27, 2006 4:44 pm

bazkitcase5 wrote:i'm starting to think he's just about always on vacation...

Good thinking ! :lol:

rich beckwith · Post by **rich beckwith** » Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:51 pm

Getting back to Alex's original question, the ACF ratings (as opposed to WCDF ratings) have been updated. However, the list of rated tournaments is not up to date, but I understand it includes 2006 TN, IL, Greensboro, and a couple Missouri tournaments, including a late entry from last year.

Nathan Gogo · Post by **Nathan Gogo** » Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:28 pm

wheres these ratings at?

Alex_Moiseyev · Post by **Alex_Moiseyev** » Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:23 pm

here

matthewkooshad · Post by **matthewkooshad** » Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:56 am

I'm suprised that only comments in this thread are ones that complain of how ratings are not up-to-date; why is it that no one comments to try to mitigate this as I implied in my post?

Post by **Jason Solan** » Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:51 am

Matthew,

i like your idea and would jump on a project to try and make that happen.... however there are people who do not have internet access and people who would prefer sending information through regulart mail.

Also, in order to be efficient, the tournament pairing forms would have to be universal. I'm not sure how close that is, but if there are some who do things completely different, that could be a problem.

just my .02
--Jason

The American Checker Federation

ACF rating

ACF rating

Re: ACF rating

Re: ACF rating

Ratings

Re: ACF rating

Tournaments Used

Re: Tournaments Used

Re: ACF rating

Re: Tournaments Used

Re: ACF rating

Re: ACF rating

Re: ACF rating

Re: ACF rating

Re: ACF rating

Re: ACF rating