I'm nearing the end of the 12-16s and have discovered this. It's new to me - were others already aware of it?
12-16 24-20; 8-12 23-18; 3-8 27-23; 16-19
10-15; 23-18 7-10 27-23; 3-7 24-20; 15-19 same.
The first sequence is unusual, but I believe it to be both sound and plausible.
New Transposition?
-
Richard Pask
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:15 pm
- What do you like about checkers?: Much!
-
Bill Salot
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 10:57 am
Re: New Transposition?
Richard,
Yes, it is in Churchill's Compilations on the Black side of the two openings.
One minor difference is CC played 16-19 before 3-8 in the 12-16, 24 20, 8-12 run-up.
Yes, it is in Churchill's Compilations on the Black side of the two openings.
One minor difference is CC played 16-19 before 3-8 in the 12-16, 24 20, 8-12 run-up.
-
Ingo_Zachos
- Posts: 1286
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:41 am
- Location: Dortmund, Germany
- Contact:
Re: New Transposition?
In GAYP it was reached by 1. 11-15 23-18, 2. 7-11 27-23, 3. 3-7 24-20, 4. 15-19 or 1. 11-15 23-18, 2. 8-11 27-23, 3.3-8 24-20, 4. 15-19 which looks most logical to me.
Greetinx from rainy Dortmund, Germany
Ingo
Greetinx from rainy Dortmund, Germany
Ingo
You can rent this space for advertising, if you like!
-
Richard Pask
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:15 pm
- What do you like about checkers?: Much!
Re: New Transposition?
Dear All,
Thanks for this. I don't personally like CC's 16-19 before 3-8; my recommendation is definitely 3-8 first.
Thanks for this. I don't personally like CC's 16-19 before 3-8; my recommendation is definitely 3-8 first.