Johnson's Position revisited!

General Discussion about the game of Checkers.
Post Reply
Richard Pask
Posts: 316
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:15 pm
What do you like about checkers?: Much!

Johnson's Position revisited!

Post by Richard Pask »

Black: man on 4, kings on 26 and 27; White; kings on 11, 18 and 19

WTP and win: ... 11-16; 27-31 18-23; 26-30 16-12; 30-25 and now 19-24!, rather than the pp 19-16, cuts out about 30 moves. Continue: 25-21 12-16; 21-17 23-18; 17-13 18-14; 31-26 16-11; 26-23 11-7; 4-8 7-10; 8-11 24-20; 23-19 10-6; 19-23 6-1; 23-19 14-9; 13-6 1-10; 19-23 20-24. White wins.

For all of this credit WCC.

Of course, having already mastered this situation, players may prefer to stay with the regular route, but interesting nonetheless.
chipschap
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 12:54 pm
What do you like about checkers?: Everything.
Location: Honolulu, Hawai'i
Contact:

Re: Johnson's Position revisited!

Post by chipschap »

It's interesting that the KingsRow 10-piece endgame database has the following evaluations: 19-24 (15), 19-15 (19), 12-16 (19), 19-16 (19) ; all four of them are wins, with 19-24 supposedly best.

Computers are interesting tools indeed and give us much insight into the game. But nothing compares with the excitement of over the board play between two skilled humans.
Richard Pask
Posts: 316
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:15 pm
What do you like about checkers?: Much!

Re: Johnson's Position revisited!

Post by Richard Pask »

I'm afraid I was guilty of not consulting Duffy's brilliant Standard Positions before I posted: there the 19-24 move is covered in detail, with the comment, 'A favourite of [John] Howe's for 40 years.' (!)

The bigger issue is that of the best continuation to promote: sometimes the quickest is not necessarily the easiest for a human to master; sometimes, as here, it cuts out play which you need to know anyway from other positions, Therefore, I've decided to stick to 19-16 anyway.
Post Reply