tommyc wrote:As you are aware he has a laptop computer
Ohhh, I didn't know this fact, otherwise I would probably play it differently against Ryan in the last round of TN Open 2007. Here is a text of game where I was lucky to win. If there is any program under the sun, where Ryan moves are matching 50%,

- I would like to get this program and play with it every day in the morning before day started !
[Event "NT 2007, Masters, Rd. 8"]
[Date "March 4"]
[Black "R. Pronk"]
[White "A. Moiseyev"]
[Result "0-2"]
1. 10-14 23-19 2. 14-18 22x15 3. 11x18 26-22 4. 7-11 22x15 5. 11x18 30-26 6. 8-11 24-20 7. 9-14
(A) 19-16 8. 12x19 27-23 9. 18x27 32x7 10. 2x11
(B) 25-22 11. 4-8 22-17 12. 6-10 29-25 13. 5-9 17-13 14. 1-6
(C) 26-23 15. 10-15 23-19 (
D) 16. 15x24 28x19 17. 3-7
(E) 31-27 18. 14-18 21-17 19. 7-10 25-21 20. 11-15 27-24 21. 18-23 20-16 22. 8-12 16-11 23. 23-27 11-7 24. 27-32 7-2 25. 32-27 2-7 26. 27x20 7x5 27. 15x24 17-14
White Wins (F)#1

#2

#3
A. See
diagram #1. As longer I looked at this position, as less I liked anything here and hate any white move. Almost each white move here goes to complictions and pushed me to think, which I really don't like to do without serious reason. Thats why I took trade three-for-three
B. See position after trade on the
diagram #2. Here where the fun begins.
C. This move loses and I almost dropped my chear when Ryan played it. And obviously this move also proved that Ryan didn't use any additional help. None program would find and make this move
D. Opps ! It was my turn to screw things. This move misses a win. 28-24 would be correct way to play. See
diagram #3 before 23-19?
E. Anyone who bought SIXTH is aware: "It doesn't matter who first made mistake, it is important - who made it last". In this game it was Ryan. 14-18 drew the game. Continue: 21-17 18-23 25-22 3-7 22-18 7-10 17-14 (thats what I planned during the game. Anything else also draw) 10-17 19-16 17-21 16-7 21-25 7-3 8-12 3-7 25-29 18-15 29-25
Draw)
F. Pretty end of pretty game.