5x5 puzzle

Discussion and analysis about certain positions.
J_D_C_
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:42 am
Location: Louisville, Kentucky

Re: 5x5 puzzle

Post by J_D_C_ »

:shock: That is a tuff ending. At move 36 is something I believed 24-20 would run into, but I'm not going to argue with a 10 peice database :) I deffinatly did not see how hard it would be to trade from that position either.
Jonathon Chappell
User avatar
matthewkooshad
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 3:08 pm
Location: Mississippi, USA
Contact:

Re: 5x5 puzzle

Post by matthewkooshad »

That is insane, Ed! Congrats Ingo on finding the stronger play :!:
A checkers cake haha :lol:
Image
Ingo_Zachos
Posts: 1286
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Dortmund, Germany
Contact:

Re: 5x5 puzzle

Post by Ingo_Zachos »

Hmmm, lecker!!!

(ie "Hmmmm, delicious").

Thx for the cake Matthew :-))

So I am as good as a database, horray. If only all positions would be five Kings aginst five Kings ;-)
But I had assistance for "developing" my idea:

Jonathan , I must admit I looked at 20-24 first and liked it most at first glance, and Sune, the advance 32-27 is the threat, so the idea to "prevent" it was brought up by u before, and Matthew showed that the single corner pieces may advance without 32-27 too disturbing. Alex, u brought up the idea 1. 5-9 32-27, 2. 19-24 27-23, 3. 1-5 , which also works by 1. 1-6 32-27, 2. 19-24 27-32, 3. 6-9, what is what I found without knowing your posting, but obviously u had this tactical idea first.

So let me share part of the cake with u , okay ?

Greetinx from cold and freezing Dortmund, Germany,

Ingo Zachos
User avatar
Alex_Moiseyev
Posts: 4342
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:03 pm
What do you like about checkers?: .....

Re: 5x5 puzzle

Post by Alex_Moiseyev »

Ingo, my congrats ! You are a man :lol: I was unable to find an idea and advantage of 1-6 compare with 5-9. You have great intuition and bright future in checkers.

I like cakes, but this one - all yours ! Be a winner :P
I am playing checkers, not chess.
Post Reply