2009 " Arthur Niederhoffer" Youth nationals 1st day results

Talk about upcoming tournaments or your experience at tournaments.
Post Reply
kim willis
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:06 am

2009 " Arthur Niederhoffer" Youth nationals 1st day results

Post by kim willis »

hello everyone

I am going to post the 4rd played today.

Adult Youth

Trey Stanley 6pts
Josh Armstrong 15pts
Alex Holmes 7pts

Youth Minor

Solomon Reece 15pts
Derek Leitner (newplayer) 9pts
Forest Reece 4pts

This was a small field of youth this year and I see that these young players really love this game.I would encourage all of you to stop and look at what you can do to help the young players.If you have children or even grandchildren all it takes is a hour a day to get involved. These young players are our future.

Playing time tomorrow will begin at 9am.

total of 7 rds

Kim
User avatar
Alex_Moiseyev
Posts: 4358
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:03 pm
What do you like about checkers?: .....

Re: 2009 " Arthur Niederhoffer" Youth nationals 1st day results

Post by Alex_Moiseyev »

Kim, thanks for information !

What are players ages ?

My congratulations to Josh and Solomon who seems already well secured (any possible surprises ?) a victory. As a "cautious optimist" :lol: I hope that overturn in our Youth tournaments will be be improve in the nearest future.

Regards,

Alex
I am playing checkers, not chess.
User avatar
Michael Holmes
Posts: 671
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:26 am
Location: Fort Knox, KY

Re: 2009 " Arthur Niederhoffer" Youth nationals 1st day results

Post by Michael Holmes »

Josh is 17. Trey is 14. Alex is 10

Others in youth group were 12, 11, and 10.
Michael

Alex was lucky enough to have to wins against Josh but he did not keep the wins. A couple of those games he played like a strong major player.

[Event "2009 GAYP Youth National"]
[Date ""]
[Black "Josh"]
[White "Alex Holmes"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
1. 11-15 23-19 2. 8-11 21-17 3. 9-14 17-13 4. 11-16 24-20 5. 16x23 27x11 6. 7x16 20x11 7.
3-8
{This is a little stronger from the 22-17 variation but we all know 3-7 is standard.}
11-7 8. 2x11 25-21 {Moving the piece on 26, 31, or 32 is better.} 9. 11-16 22-17 10.
14-18 {A very aggressive move but loses if played against correctly} 28-24
{Allows a draw. Attacking the piece with 32-27 wins.} 11. 8-11
{The 8 piece seems to think this is very weak but I cant tell if it loses or not.}
29-25 12. 18-23 26x19 13. 16x23 25-22 14. 11-15 24-20 15. 5-9 31-27 {20-16 is better} 16.
23-26 30x23 17. 15-19 {loses. 4-8 draws.} 23x16 18. 12x19 20-16 19. 4-8 16-12 20. 8-11 12-8
21. 11-16 8-3 22. 16-20 3-8 23. 19-24 27-23 24. 24-27 23-18 25. 27-31 8-11 26. 31-26 11-16
27. 26-23 32-28 {Allows a draw. 18-15 x 22-18 x wins.} 28. 23x14 16-19 29. 10-15 19x10
30. 14x7 22-18 31. 7-2 18-15 32. 2-7 15-10 33. 6x15 13x6 34. 1x10 17-13 35. 15-19 13-9 36.
10-14
{The game was not annotated after this and eventually Alex lost a piece but drew the game.}
9-6 37. 7-2 6-1 38. 14-18 21-17 39. 19-23 17-13 40. 2-7 1-6 41. 20-24 28x19 42. 7-11 19-15
43. 11-7 6-2 44. 7-3
{The very last few moves were just put in to show a drawn position as the game turned out.}
1/2-1/2
Post Reply